弗罗里达州法院规定 吸食毒品的警犬警报 并不能证明无证搜查大麻是正当的 Florida court rules drug-sniffing dog alerts don't justify warrantless searches for marijuana.

一个佛罗里达州上诉法院裁定,如果狗无法区分合法大麻和非法大麻,吸食毒品的狗的警报不能成为无证搜查车辆的理由。 A Florida appeals court ruled that a drug-sniffing dog's alert does not justify a warrantless vehicle search if the dog cannot distinguish between legal and illegal marijuana. 这一决定源于一个案例,即一名乘客因在警犬警报后发现毒品被捕。 This decision stems from a case where a passenger was arrested for drugs found after a dog alert. 法院同意这只狗不能区分合法和非法物质 使得无证搜查复杂化 The court agreed the dog couldn't differentiate between legal and illegal substances, complicating warrantless searches. 尽管如此,法院还是根据“善意”例外维持了这一具体案件。 Despite this, the court upheld the specific case under a "good faith" exception.