最高法院6-3号裁决维持了社会媒体公司的第一修正案权利,驳回了Alito关于内容温和的意见草案。 Supreme Court's 6-3 decision upheld First Amendment rights of social media companies, rejecting Alito's draft opinion on content moderation.

最高法院法官Samuel Alito在今年的两起引人注目的案件中, 遭到Amy Coney Barrett和Ketanji Brown Jackson法官的反对, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito faced opposition and lost majority support from Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson in two high-profile cases this year, according to a CNN report. 在Moody诉NetChoice LLC案中,Alito的意见草案质疑《第一修正案》是否保护社交媒体平台的内容温和。 In the Moody v. NetChoice LLC case, Alito's draft opinion questioned whether content moderation on social media platforms is protected under the First Amendment. 这个案例围绕德克萨斯州和佛罗里达州的法律, 试图限制社交媒体平台过滤第三方信息、视频和内容的能力。 The case revolved around Texas and Florida laws that sought to limit the ability of social media platforms to filter third-party messages, videos, and content. 尽管Alito努力支持保守国家限制社交媒体平台过滤内容的方式, 但最终裁决维持了社群媒体公司第一修正案的权利, Despite Alito's efforts to support conservative states in restricting how social media platforms filter content, the final ruling upheld the First Amendment rights of social media companies, with a 6-3 majority led by Justice Elena Kagan.