伦敦法官裁定，英国政府没有无理剥夺哈里王子的安全特权。 London judge ruled that the UK government did not irrationally strip Prince Harry of security privileges.
伦敦法官彼得·莱恩裁定，英国政府在哈里王子离开王室移居美国后剥夺他的安全特权并没有采取不合理的行为。 London judge Peter Lane ruled that the UK government did not act irrationally in stripping Prince Harry of security privileges after he left the royal family and moved to the US. 法官认为，2020 年 2 月根据需要为苏塞克斯公爵提供安全的决定并非非法、不合理或不合理。 The judge found that the February 2020 decision to provide security on an as-needed basis for the Duke of Sussex was not unlawful, irrational, or unjustified. 哈里王子计划对裁决提出上诉，认为皇家和贵宾执行委员会 (RAVEC) 的行为不合理，未能遵循其自身安全风险分析政策。 Prince Harry plans to appeal the ruling, arguing that the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC) acted irrationally and failed to follow its own policies concerning risk analysis for his safety.