印度的支持者呼吁IndiGo航空公司使用“特价”, 引发关于航空公司定价透明度的辩论。 Indian advocate calls out IndiGo Airlines for "Cute Fee", sparking debate on airline pricing transparency.
印度倡导者 Shrayansh Singh 的一篇病毒式帖子引发了关于航空公司定价透明度的辩论，质疑他的 IndiGo Airlines 机票上的“可爱费”、“用户开发费”和“航空安全费”。 Indian advocate Shrayansh Singh sparked debate over transparency in airline pricing with a viral post questioning the "Cute Fee," "User Development Fee," and "Aviation Security Fee" on his IndiGo Airlines ticket. 印度航空公司澄清说,这些"可爱的费用"实际上是普通用户终端设备费用,涵盖金属探测器,自动扶梯和其他机场基础设施. IndiGo clarified that the "Cute charges" were actually Common User Terminal Equipment charges, covering metal-detecting machines, escalators, and other airport infrastructure. Singh认为,这些费用应由税收而不是向乘客收取额外费用来支付,这促使人们就航空公司定价的透明度和问责制问题进行更广泛的对话。 Singh argued that these costs should be covered by taxes rather than additional fees charged to passengers, prompting a broader conversation on the issue of transparency and accountability in airline pricing.