孟买高等法院裁定,在抗逆转录病毒疗法案件中,鸡蛋捐赠者没有作为生身父母的合法权利。 Bombay High Court ruled that egg donors have no legal rights as biological parents in ART cases.
孟买高等法院裁定,鸡蛋捐赠者作为亲生父母对通过辅助生殖技术怀孕的儿童没有合法权利。 Bombay High Court ruled that egg donors have no legal rights as biological parents for children conceived through assisted reproductive technology. 法院的裁决是基于一个案件,该案涉及一名妇女,她寻求接触她通过代孕怀孕的5岁双胞胎女儿,她的丈夫辩称,他的小姨,即卵子捐献者,应享有父母权利。 The court's decision was based on a case involving a woman who sought access to her five-year-old twin daughters, conceived through surrogacy, where her husband argued his sister-in-law, the egg donor, should have parental rights. 法院驳回了这一申诉,声称捐赠者的作用是自愿的,没有赋予父母权利。 The court rejected this claim, asserting that the donor's role was voluntary and did not confer parental rights.