德里高等法院驳回针对 Truecaller 的请愿，裁定其来电身份服务属于现代电话簿，而不是侵犯隐私。 Delhi High Court dismisses petition against Truecaller, ruling its caller-identity service as modern-day phone directories, not privacy violation.

德里高等法院驳回了针对移动应用程序 Truecaller 的请愿书，裁定其提供未知号码来电者身份的服务类似于现代的传统电话簿。 The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition against the mobile application Truecaller, ruling that its service of providing caller identity from unknown numbers is akin to a modern-day equivalent of traditional phone directories. 请愿人 Ajay Shukla 认为，Truecaller 在未经第三方同意的情况下提供与第三方相关的信息，侵犯了隐私，可能会造成声誉损害。 The petitioner, Ajay Shukla, argued that Truecaller violates privacy by providing information related to third parties without their consent, potentially causing reputational damage. 然而，法院发现该服务类似于传统的电话簿，并拒绝舒克拉进一步向高等法院求助的自由。 However, the court found that the service is akin to a traditional phone directory and denied Shukla further liberty to approach the high court.