德里高等法院驳回了 Lotus Herbals 的临时禁令，认为 Deepika Padukone 的 82°E 品牌及其产品“Lotus Splash”不存在商标侵权。 Delhi High Court denies Lotus Herbals interim injunction, finding no trademark infringement from Deepika Padukone's 82°E brand with its product "Lotus Splash".
德里高等法院在针对迪皮卡·帕度柯妮 (Deepika Padukone) 的自我护理品牌 82°E 的商标侵权案件中，拒绝授予有利于 Lotus Herbals 的临时禁令，该案件特别涉及产品“Lotus Splash”温和洁面乳。 The Delhi High Court has refused to grant an interim injunction in favor of Lotus Herbals in its trademark infringement case against Deepika Padukone's self-care brand, 82°E, specifically relating to the product "Lotus Splash" gentle face cleanser. 法官 C. Hari Shankar 表示，这些产品在外观上存在显着差异，价格差异也很大，没有发现假冒案件的理由。 Justice C. Hari Shankar stated that the products exhibited significant dissimilarities in appearance, with substantial price variations, and found no grounds for a passing-off case. 法院表示，消费者会意识到“Lotus Splash”与原告的 Lotus 系列产品之间的区别。 The court said the consumer would be aware of the difference between 'Lotus Splash' and the plaintiff's Lotus family of products.