美国法院的摄像机引发了关于透明度和陪审团偏见的争论. US court cameras spark debate over transparency and jury prejudice.

美国法庭的摄像机自1935年林德伯格审判以来引发了争论, Cameras in U.S. courtrooms have sparked debate since the 1935 Lindbergh trial, with modern cases like O.J. 辛普森正在重新启动对话. Simpson's reigniting the conversation. 检察官认为摄像机促进透明度, 反对错误信息, 而辩护律师警告他们可能会偏见陪审团. Prosecutors argue cameras promote transparency and counter misinformation, while defense attorneys warn they risk prejudicing juries. 美国最高法院裁定各州可以允许摄像机, 但联邦法庭仍然基本上没有摄像头. The Supreme Court ruled states can permit cameras, but federal courts remain largely camera-free.