最高法院在司法审查问题上有模糊性后, 命令为法律考试候选人增加额外的职位. Supreme Court orders extra post for law exam candidate after ruling question on judicial review was ambiguous.

由于宪法问题含糊不清,没有明确的正确答案, 最高法院裁定在2021年地加尔法律官员考试中应适应这两名候选人. The Supreme Court ruled that both candidates in a 2021 Chandigarh law officer exam should be accommodated after finding a constitutional question ambiguous, with no clear correct answer. 问题是哪个时间表不受司法审查,而考官接受了第九次计划,一名候选人选择"没有上述",引用不断发展的法律解释. The question asked which schedule is immune from judicial review, and while the examiners accepted the Ninth Schedule, a candidate chose "none of the above," citing evolving legal interpretations. 法院指出,法官们自己在这个问题上存在分歧,因此对候选人进行处罚是不合理的. The Court noted judges themselves disagree on the issue, making it unreasonable to penalize candidates. 为了确保公平,它下令为第二名候选人设立一个超额职位,同时维持原来的任命人员的资历. To ensure fairness, it ordered a supernumerary post created for the second candidate, while upholding the original appointee’s seniority.