最高法院拒绝审理记者Ravi Nair就与2024年一篇关于Adani集团的文章有关的诽谤案提出的上诉,该文章将他引向古吉拉特高等法院。 The Supreme Court refused to hear journalist Ravi Nair’s appeal over a defamation case linked to a 2024 article on Adani Group, directing him to the Gujarat High Court.

最高法院于2026年3月16日拒绝听取记者Ravi Nair的上诉, 质疑古吉拉特犯罪科在2024年《华盛顿邮报》一篇文章中发出的传票, 指控Adani集团和印度人寿保险公司投资39亿美元。 The Supreme Court on March 16, 2026, declined to hear journalist Ravi Nair’s appeal challenging a summons from Gujarat’s Crime Branch over a 2024 Washington Post article alleging a $3.9 billion investment plan involving the Adani Group and India’s Life Insurance Corporation. 法院由Vikram Nath法官和Sandeep Mehta法官领导,驳回了撤回的抗辩,并指示Nair向古吉拉特高等法院寻求救济,指出他尚未用尽下级法院的补救办法。 The Court, led by Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, dismissed the plea as withdrawn and directed Nair to seek relief from the Gujarat High Court, noting he had not exhausted lower court remedies. 传票是在Adani Ports和SEZ Ltd提出申诉之后发出的。 The summons followed a complaint by Adani Ports and SEZ Ltd. 判决是在一个单独的古吉拉特法院在一个刑事诽谤案件中判定Nair有罪、判处他一年监禁和对被认为诽谤且缺乏足够证据支持腐败和政治偏私指控的在线职位罚款5 000元之后作出的。 The decision comes after a separate Gujarat court convicted Nair in a criminal defamation case, sentencing him to one year in prison and a ₹5,000 fine for online posts deemed defamatory and lacking sufficient evidence to support claims of corruption and political favoritism. 法院没有就案件的案情作出裁定,也没有对指控作出评论。 The Court did not rule on the merits of the case or comment on the allegations.