最高法院拒绝对印度为期五年的L.B.进行大修。 方案,列举需要利益攸关方投入和禁止司法干预。 The Supreme Court declined to overhaul India’s five-year LL.B. program, citing need for stakeholder input and barring judicial intervention.

印度最高法院在2026年3月16日表示,它不会对印度五年综合法学学士学位进行改变. The Supreme Court on March 16, 2026, said it won’t dictate changes to India’s five-year integrated LL.B. 强调法律教育改革需要广泛的利益攸关方投入,而不是司法干预。 course, emphasizing that legal education reforms require broad stakeholder input, not judicial intervention. 听取Ashwini Upadhyay律师Ashwini Upadhyay律师要求获得四年法律学位和设立法律教育委员会的意见时,法院注意到在现代法学院之前的五年模式,并强调印度律师理事会而不是司法机构负责监督课程和期限。 Hearing a PIL by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay calling for a four-year law degree and a Legal Education Commission, the court noted the five-year model predates modern law schools and stressed that the Bar Council of India, not the judiciary, oversees curriculum and duration. 由首席法官Surya Kant领导的法官席质疑,如果大学本身反对目前的结构,是否有必要采取法院行动,并指示在2026年4月对案件进行进一步审理。 The bench, led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, questioned the need for court action if universities themselves oppose the current structure and directed the case for further hearing in April 2026.