明尼苏达州在民事案件中使用军法咨询组军事律师面临法律挑战, Minnesota faces legal challenge over using military JAG lawyers in civilian cases, citing constitutional concerns.

明尼苏达州的美国检察厅正面临对使用军法署署长团律师(包括没有联邦法院经验的律师)在人员短缺的情况下起诉民事刑事案件的严格审查。 Minnesota’s U.S. Attorney’s Office is facing scrutiny for using military Judge Advocate General (JAG) Corps lawyers, including those without federal court experience, to prosecute civilian criminal cases amid staffing shortages. 由John Marti率领的11名前军事律师提出动议,要求将陆军JAG Michael Hakes-Rodriguez从一起重罪袭击案中除名,理由是宪法对军事参与民事司法表示关切。 A group of 11 former military attorneys, led by John Marti, has filed a motion to remove Army JAG Michael Hakes-Rodriguez from a felony assault case, citing constitutional concerns over military involvement in civilian justice. 他们辩称,这种做法破坏了军事权力和民事权力的分离,有可能导致民主规范。 They argue the practice undermines the separation of military and civilian authority, risking democratic norms. 司法部根据一项法律备忘录,为使用联合咨询组律师辩护,认为他们是合法的,允许他们担任美国特别助理。 The Department of Justice defends the use of JAG attorneys as lawful under a legal memorandum allowing them to serve as Special Assistant U.S. 由平民控制的检察官。 Attorneys under civilian control. 关于该动议的听证会定于下个月早些时候举行。 A hearing on the motion is scheduled for early next month.