一个德里法院将Antrix-Devas案件发回Bengaluru,援引《防止腐败法》规定的适当管辖权。 A Delhi court sent the Antrix-Devas case back to Bengaluru, citing proper jurisdiction under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

新德里一家CBI特别法院在Antrix-Devas案10年后退回了起诉表,裁定它没有管辖权,并指示CBI在Bengaluru重新提交案件,在该地发生了《预防腐败法》规定的关键事件。 A New Delhi Special CBI court has returned the charge sheet in the Antrix-Devas case after 10 years, ruling it lacked jurisdiction and directing the CBI to refile the case in Bengaluru, where key events under the Prevention of Corruption Act occurred. 这一决定是在被告Veena S Rao提出质疑之后作出的,他的律师争辩说,所有重大活动,包括涉及印度空间研究组织、Antrix和Devas多媒体的活动,都发生在Karnataka。 The decision followed a challenge by accused Veena S Rao, whose lawyers argued that all major activities, including those involving ISRO, Antrix, and Devas Multimedia, took place in Karnataka. 法院同意,指出管辖权必须与《刑法》所述犯罪发生时的管辖权相一致,而不是与行政决定发生时的管辖权相一致。 The court agreed, stating jurisdiction must align with where offences under the PC Act occurred, not where administrative decisions were made. CBI由于在首都举行会议和获得批准而要求德里管辖权。 The CBI had claimed Delhi jurisdiction due to meetings and approvals in the capital. 本案涉及2005年非法租赁频谱的指控,此前曾下令进一步调查前官员SK Das和RG Nadadur。 The case, involving allegations of illegal spectrum leasing in 2005, previously prompted orders for further probe into former officials SK Das and RG Nadadur.