一名都柏林妇女失去了将子女从爱尔兰西部迁移到都柏林找工作的上诉权,因为法院裁定她的职业生涯优先于子女的稳定和福利。 A Dublin woman lost her appeal to move her children from the west of Ireland to Dublin for a job, as the court ruled it prioritized her career over the children’s stability and welfare.

一名都柏林妇女失去了高等法院关于将她的两个子女从爱尔兰西部转移到都柏林从事新的金融部门工作的上诉。 A Dublin woman has lost her High Court appeal to move her two children from the west of Ireland to Dublin for a new financial sector job. 马克斯·巴雷特法官裁定,拟议的搬迁更多地是出于她的个人不满和职业目标,而不是儿童福利。 Judge Max Barrett ruled the proposed relocation was driven more by her personal dissatisfaction and career goals than the children’s welfare. 尽管她声称因生活在西部而承受压力,但法官没有发现任何可信的伤害证据,注意到她在都柏林一家家中拥有股权,并强调指出,法院心理学家建议孩子们留在目前的环境中。 Despite her claims of stress from living in the west, the judge found no credible evidence of harm, noted she owned equity in a Dublin home, and highlighted that court psychologists recommended the children remain in their current environment. 父亲仍然积极参与并拥有灵活的工作,没有就她的工作或新计划征求父亲的意见。 The father, who remains actively involved and has a flexible job, was not consulted about her engagement or new plans. 法官的结论是,将儿童连根拔起将破坏他们的稳定、友谊和日常生活,拟议的联系时间表将破坏共同养育子女。 The judge concluded that uprooting the children would disrupt their stability, friendships, and routines, and that the proposed contact schedule would undermine shared parenting. 现行监护安排得到维持。 The existing custody arrangement was upheld.