国会质疑Rijiju的历史比较, 认为Nehru要求延长辩论时间, 目前副议长空缺, Congress disputes Rijiju's historical comparison, citing Nehru's request for extended debate time and the current deputy speaker vacancy as a constitutional lapse.

国会质疑联盟部长Kiren Rijiju将目前两天的Lok Sabha演讲人驱离辩论比作1954年为期2.5小时的会议的做法,指出尼赫鲁总理当时敦促延长反对时间。 The Congress challenged Union Minister Kiren Rijiju's comparison of the current two-day Lok Sabha speaker removal debate to a 1954 session lasting 2.5 hours, noting Prime Minister Nehru had urged extended opposition time then. 国会领袖拉梅什(Jairam Ramesh)引述了历史背景, 包括尼赫鲁(Nehru)要求更多时间以及当时的国会多数, 并强调自2019年以来没有副议长, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh cited historical context, including Nehru’s request for more time and the Congress’s then-large majority, and highlighted the absence of a deputy speaker since 2019, calling it a constitutional lapse. Rijiju为旷日持久的辩论辩护,而反对党议员则指控议长Om Birla因暂停和限制言论而持有党派立场,尽管政府保持了他的公正性。 Rijiju defended the extended debate duration, while opposition MPs accused Speaker Om Birla of partisanship over suspensions and speech restrictions, though the government maintained his impartiality. Birla没有出席辩论,尽管《宪法》允许这样做。 Birla did not attend the debate, though the Constitution allows it.