最高法院驳回Devangana Kalita关于重建抗议案件日记的请求,维持先前的裁决。 Supreme Court denies Devangana Kalita's request to reconstruct protest case diaries, upholding prior ruling.

最高法院于2026年3月9日驳回维权人士Devangana Kalita关于从她2020年反CAA抗争案中重建案件日记的请求, 维持德里高等法院驳回该请求的裁决。 The Supreme Court on March 9, 2026, rejected activist Devangana Kalita’s plea to reconstruct case diaries from her 2020 anti-CAA protest case, upholding a Delhi High Court decision that denied the request. 法院裁定,原始记录足够充分,重建不必要,特别是因为有争议的日记卷可能已经用于其他调查。 The court ruled that original records were sufficient, and reconstruction was not warranted, particularly since disputed diary volumes may have been used in other investigations. Kalita曾指控警察篡改和预告证人证词,但法院认为,在现阶段无法证实这种指控,指出第161节《刑法》第161节陈述不是实质性证据。 Kalita had alleged police tampering and ante-dating of witness statements, but the court found such claims unprovable at this stage, noting Section 161 CrPC statements are not substantive evidence. 裁决保留了现有证据记录,没有构成法律先例。 The ruling preserves the existing evidentiary record without setting a legal precedent.