德里法院以无事实根据的申诉和缺乏证据为由,驳回了一名妇女提出的赡养费上诉。 A Delhi court denied a woman's maintenance appeal, citing unsubstantiated claims and lack of evidence.

德里法院驳回了一名妇女关于临时赡养费的上诉,维持了下级法院关于她的要求缺乏法律依据的裁决。 A Delhi court dismissed a woman's appeal for interim maintenance, upholding a lower court's ruling that her claims lacked legal basis. 该案涉及16个月的婚姻,以有关嫁妆骚扰、强奸和非正常性交的指控为中心,法院认为这些指控没有事实根据。 The case, involving a 16-month marriage, centered on allegations of dowry harassment, rape, and unnatural intercourse, which the court deemed unsubstantiated. 注意到存在严重矛盾,包括2023年7月CAW小组投诉与2024年2月FIR登记之间的拖延。 Serious contradictions were noted, including a delay between her July 2023 CAW Cell complaint and February 2024 FIR registration. 法院强调了丈夫伪造和强迫占有财产的多重情况,并指出,该妇女及其家人占用有争议的财产,而丈夫则住在租用的住房中。 The court highlighted the husband’s multiple FIRs for forgery and forcible property occupation, and observed that the woman and her family occupied the disputed property while the husband lived in rented housing. 由于缺乏文件证据,并面临可信度问题,她的赡养费索赔被驳回,尽管她在正在进行的审判中可以重新提出证据。 Lacking documentary proof and facing credibility issues, her maintenance claim was denied, though she may reapply with evidence in the ongoing trial.