一位法官质疑伊利诺伊河污染案的解决方案, 怀疑Tyson、Pilgrim的Pried和Sandoson农场是否会修补长期损害。 A judge questioned proposed settlements in the Illinois River pollution case, doubting if poultry litter limits by Tyson, Pilgrim’s Pride, and Sanderson Farms will fix long-term damage.

俄克拉荷马州塔尔萨(Tulsa)的一位联邦法官对伊利诺伊河污染诉讼案的解决方案表示强烈怀疑, 质疑Tyson Foods、Pilgrim Pride 和 Sanderson 农场家禽垃圾使用上限是否能有效解决长期环境损害问题。 A federal judge in Tulsa, Oklahoma, voiced heightened skepticism Friday about proposed settlements in the Illinois River pollution lawsuit, questioning whether caps on poultry litter use by Tyson Foods, Pilgrim’s Pride, and Sanderson Farms would effectively address long-term environmental damage. 这些定居点包括数以百万计的清理付款和分阶段减少垃圾应用,旨在解决自2016年以来就违反环境法的农业径流问题进行的法律斗争。 The settlements, which include millions in cleanup payments and phased reductions in litter application, aim to resolve a legal battle dating to 2016 over agricultural runoff violating environmental laws. 虽然法官承认立即为恢复工作提供资金,但他对这些措施是否充分及其可执行性表示关切,因为法律程序在继续,推迟作出决定。 While the judge acknowledged the immediate funding for restoration, he raised concerns about the adequacy of the measures and their enforceability, delaying a decision as legal proceedings continue.