喀拉拉邦法院审查前部长Antony Raju对2026年因1990年毒品案中的证据篡改而被定罪的上诉。 Kerala court reviews former minister Antony Raju’s appeal against 2026 conviction for evidence tampering in a 1990 drug case.

喀拉拉邦高等法院正在审查前运输部长Antony Raju的上诉, 以中止他因据称在1990年涉及一名澳大利亚国民的毒品案件中篡改证据而被定罪的2026年判决。 The Kerala High Court is reviewing former Transport Minister Antony Raju’s appeal to suspend his 2026 conviction for allegedly tampering with evidence in a 1990 drug case involving an Australian national. 左翼民主阵线(Left Democratic Front)的一名关键人物Raju认为, 剥夺他参加即将举行的议会选举的资格的定罪是不公正的, 原因是拖延了35年、法律推理有缺陷、以及缺乏意图证明。 Raju, a key figure in the Left Democratic Front, argues the conviction, which disqualified him from contesting the upcoming Assembly elections, is unjust due to a 35-year delay, flawed legal reasoning, and lack of proof of intent. 国家反对上诉,声称暂停定罪会损害选举的完整性,而且根据《人民代表法》取消资格是自动和法定的。 The state opposes the appeal, asserting that suspending the conviction would undermine electoral integrity and that disqualification under the Representation of the People Act is automatic and statutory. 法院质疑作为初级律师的Raju是否具有必要的意图,以及他的高级同事是否知道所指控的篡改行为。 The court questioned whether Raju, as a junior lawyer, had the necessary intent and whether his senior colleague was aware of the alleged tampering. 法院在听取双方的论点后保留其判决。 The court reserved its verdict after hearing arguments from both sides.