最高法院使用人工智能伪造的法院裁决作出裁决，是司法不当行为，而非错误。 Supreme Court rules using AI-fabricated court rulings is judicial misconduct, not error.

最高法院裁定,在Andhra Pradesh的一个审判法院援引了一个案件中的捏造判决之后,依靠AI产生的、不存在的法院判决构成司法不当行为,而不是简单的错误。 The Supreme Court has ruled that relying on AI-generated, non-existent court verdicts constitutes judicial misconduct, not a simple error, after a trial court in Andhra Pradesh cited fabricated judgments in a case. 法庭由P S Narasimha法官和Alok Aradhe法官领导,向高级法律官员发出通知,任命资深律师Shyam Divan为法庭之友,并在3月10日庭审之前停止根据律师顾问的报告进行的诉讼。 The court, led by Justices P S Narasimha and Alok Aradhe, issued notices to top legal officials, appointed senior advocate Shyam Divan as amicus curiae, and halted proceedings based on the advocate-commissioner’s report pending a March 10 hearing. 这一判决凸显了人们对人工智能在法律程序中滥用的日益担忧，此前此前曾警告存在虚假案例引用。 The decision underscores growing concerns about AI misuse in legal proceedings, following prior warnings about fake case citations.