最高法院拒绝审查AI艺术版权案件,认为只有人类创作的作品受到保护。 Supreme Court refuses to review AI art copyright case, upholding that only human-created works are protected.

美国最高法院拒绝审理一个质疑人工智能创作的艺术作品是否可以获得版权的案件,维持下级法院关于只有人造作品才有资格得到保护的裁决。 The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear a case challenging whether AI-generated artwork can be copyrighted, upholding lower court rulings that only human-authored works qualify for protection. 该决定源自2018年计算机科学家Stephen Thaler提出的一项索赔,确认美国为美国。 The decision, stemming from a 2018 claim by computer scientist Stephen Thaler, confirms the U.S. 版权局的立场是,AI创造的缺乏人类著作权的内容不具有版权资格。 Copyright Office’s stance that AI-created content lacking human authorship is not eligible for copyright. 该裁决维持了目前的法律标准,要求为版权资格提供大量的人类创造性投入,并将这一问题留待今后的案件解决。 The ruling maintains the current legal standard, requiring substantial human creative input for copyright eligibility, and leaves the issue unresolved for future cases.