美国和以色列袭击伊朗,引发关于安全、合宪性和升级风险的党派辩论。 The U.S. and Israel struck Iran, sparking partisan debate over security, constitutionality, and escalation risks.

美国和以色列对伊朗发动军事打击, 得克萨斯州立法者对此反应尖锐。 The U.S. and Israel conducted military strikes on Iran, drawing sharp reactions from Texas lawmakers. 共和党人,包括参议员科尼恩和克鲁斯以及众议员韦伯和麦考尔(Weber和McCall)都支持这一行动,并援引伊朗的核野心、恐怖主义和对美国安全的威胁,同时呼吁改变政权。 Republicans, including Senators Cornyn and Cruz and Representatives Weber and McCall, supported the action, citing Iran’s nuclear ambitions, terrorism, and threats to U.S. security, while calling for regime change. 帕克斯顿总检察长支持了军方 Attorney General Paxton backed the military. Vasiey和Crockett等民主党人反对罢工,认为罢工违反宪法战争权力,缺乏明确的战略,有可能升级为更广泛的冲突,敦促国会采取行动。 Democrats, such as Representatives Veasey and Crockett, opposed the strikes, arguing they violate constitutional war powers, lack a clear strategy, and risk escalating into a broader conflict, urging Congress to act.