2025年12月,LA四年级学生用Adobe Express制作了不当的人工智能图像Pippi Longstocking,引起全国对学校未经审查的人工智能工具的担忧。 In Dec 2025, LA fourth graders created inappropriate AI images of Pippi Longstocking using Adobe Express, sparking national concern over unvetted AI tools in schools.

2025年12月,洛杉矶一所小学的四年级学生在使用Adobe Express for education(Adobe Express for education)的同时,制作了不当的人工智能图像Pippi Longstocking,引起全国对教室内未经审查的人工智能工具的关切。 In December 2025, fourth graders at a Los Angeles elementary school generated inappropriate AI images of Pippi Longstocking while using Adobe Express for Education, sparking national concern over unvetted AI tools in classrooms. 家长们报告了学校设备方面的类似结果,导致家长带头的反弹,事件被称为“Pippigate ” 。 作为回应,加利福尼亚州发布了与教育工作者和专家共同制定的最新AI准则,敦促在道德上使用并告诫人们不要伤害他人,但批评家们说,这些规则缺乏可执行的保障,并且没有限制AI在早期的使用。 Parents reported similar results on school devices, leading to a parent-led backlash and the incident being dubbed “Pippigate.” In response, California released updated AI guidelines developed with educators and experts, urging ethical use and cautioning against plagiarism, but critics say the rules lack enforceable safeguards and fail to restrict AI use in early grades. 尽管Adobe声称24小时固定,但对于儿童,特别是边缘化群体使用人工智能工具的安全、测试和公平问题,人们依然感到关切。 Despite Adobe’s claim of a 24-hour fix, concerns remain about the safety, testing, and equity of AI tools used with children, especially for marginalized groups.