印度拒绝联合国安全理事会的“第三类”提案,称其为有缺陷的改革策略。 India rejects UN Security Council "third category" proposal, calling it a flawed reform tactic.

印度拒绝了联合国安全理事会成员中拟议的“第三类”成员,认为这是一种拖延战术,破坏了真正的改革。 India has rejected a proposed "third category" of UN Security Council membership, calling it a delaying tactic that undermines genuine reform. 在联合国政府间谈判中,印度的Yojna Patel将“团结谋共识”集团支持的这一想法说成是一种分散注意力的做法,它未能解决结构失衡问题,并使安理会的合法性危机永久化。 At the UN Intergovernmental Negotiations, India’s Yojna Patel labeled the idea—backed by the Uniting for Consensus group—as a distraction that fails to address structural imbalances and perpetuates the Council’s legitimacy crisis. 她争辩说,拟议的固定区域席位不会真正改善目前的非常任理事国席位的作用,并批评给予它们否决权的建议是不切实际的。 She argued the proposed fixed regional seats would offer no real improvement over current non-permanent roles and criticized suggestions of granting them veto power as impractical. 四国集团和L.69组发展中国家也反对该计划,坚持认为有意义的改革需要扩大常任和非常任席位,以反映当今的全球现实。 The G4 nations and the L.69 group of developing countries also oppose the plan, insisting that meaningful reform requires expanding both permanent and non-permanent seats to reflect today’s global realities.