最高法院质疑YouTuber Elvish Yadav使用野生生物犯罪的“无声受害者”, 调查可能违反印度《野生生物保护法》的行为。 The Supreme Court questioned YouTuber Elvish Yadav over using "voiceless victims" of wildlife crimes, probing potential violations of India's Wildlife Protection Act.

最高法院感到关切的是,YouTuber Elvish Yadav等名人利用野生生物犯罪的“无声受害者”可能发出有害信息,例如,在涉及蛇毒滥用的指控的案件中。 The Supreme Court expressed concern that celebrities like YouTuber Elvish Yadav could send a harmful message by using the "voiceless victims" of wildlife crimes, such as in a case involving alleged snake venom misuse. 法院表示,它将评估Yadav是否违反《野生动物(保护)法》,强调公众人物必须遵守高道德和法律标准。 The court signaled it would assess whether Yadav violated the Wildlife (Protection) Act, stressing that public figures must be held to high ethical and legal standards. 裁决凸显了对名人影响、环境保护以及负责任地使用数字平台的更广泛的担忧。 The ruling highlights broader worries about celebrity influence, environmental protection, and the responsible use of digital platforms.