德里高等法院以管辖权问题为由,质疑Jubin Nautuyal选择就人格权利在德里提起诉讼。 Delhi High Court questions Jubin Nautiyal’s choice to sue in Delhi over personality rights, citing jurisdiction issues.

德里高等法院质疑歌手Jubin Nautiyal选择在德里而不是他居住的Uttakhand提出个性权利诉讼,对管辖权提出了关切,特别是因为有些被告在罗马尼亚和阿联酋。 The Delhi High Court questioned singer Jubin Nautiyal’s choice to file a personality rights lawsuit in Delhi instead of Uttarakhand, where he resides, raising concerns over jurisdiction, especially since some defendants are in Romania and the UAE. 法院虽然承认未经授权使用他的形象和声音,但仔细审查了选择德里的法律依据,指出Uttakhand的法院有能力处理此案。 While acknowledging unauthorized use of his image and voice, the court scrutinized the legal basis for selecting Delhi, noting Uttarakhand’s courts are capable of handling the case. 法院保留其决定,强调仅仅在德里有中央机构的存在不能成为管辖权的理由。 The court reserved its decision, emphasizing that mere presence of central agencies in Delhi does not justify jurisdiction. 此案仍悬而未决。 The case remains pending.