法庭裁决汉密尔顿的帐篷营地是否因缺少其他住所而侵犯了宪法权利。 A court rules on whether Hamilton’s tent encampment sweeps violated constitutional rights by lacking shelter alternatives.

在《宪章》对汉密尔顿营地的强制执行提出挑战时,一个上诉小组通过在没有适当住房选择的情况下清理帐篷,裁定该市是否侵犯了宪法权利,从而结束了对《宪章》的质疑。 Arguments have concluded in a Charter challenge against Hamilton’s encampment enforcement, with an appellate panel deciding whether the city violated constitutional rights by clearing tents without adequate shelter alternatives. 案例中心声称,夜间驱逐和一揽子禁止令对妇女、土著人民和残疾人的影响格外严重,损害了安全和平等的权利。 The case centers on claims that nighttime evictions and blanket bans disproportionately affected women, Indigenous people, and those with disabilities, undermining rights to security and equality. 申请人辩称帐篷提供基本的安全和陪伴,而城市则遵守法律,拒绝夜间作业。 Applicants argue tents provide essential safety and companionship, while the city maintains compliance with law and denies late-night operations. 上诉侧重于从2021年开始的两年执行期,但寻求更广泛的政策变化。 The appeal focuses on a two-year enforcement period starting in 2021, but seeks broader policy changes. 结果可能影响整个加拿大的无家可归政策,突出表明在需求不断增长的情况下,政府需要采取协调行动和扩大住房能力。 The outcome could influence homelessness policies across Canada, highlighting the need for coordinated government action and expanded shelter capacity amid rising demand.