印度最高法院质疑RERA的有效性,建议废除它,因为未能保护购房者和受益建筑商。 India's Supreme Court questions RERA's effectiveness, suggesting its abolition due to failures in protecting homebuyers and benefiting builders.

印度最高法院批评房地产管理局,称它未能保护购房者,反而使违约建筑者受益,建议可以废除它。 The Supreme Court of India has criticized the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA), stating it fails to protect homebuyers and instead benefits defaulting builders, suggesting it may be abolished. 在2026年2月12日的裁决中, 首席大法官Surya Kant领导的法官团队质疑RERA的效力, In a ruling on February 12, 2026, a bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant questioned RERA’s effectiveness, citing delays, lack of accountability, and inconsistent implementation across states. 法院允许喜马查尔邦将RERA的总部从Shimla迁至Dharamshala,推翻高等法院的命令,并指示将上诉职能转移,以保持连续性。 The court allowed Himachal Pradesh to move RERA’s headquarters from Shimla to Dharamshala, overturning a high court order, and directed that appellate functions be transferred to maintain continuity. 这些评论反映出司法界对RERA能否确保房地产的透明度和及时公正日益持怀疑态度,促使人们呼吁重新评价其结构和宗旨。 The remarks reflect growing judicial skepticism about RERA’s ability to ensure transparency and timely justice in real estate, prompting calls for a reevaluation of its structure and purpose.