最高法院驳回议员对追溯环境审查的质疑,维持先前的裁决。 Supreme Court rejects MP's challenge to retrospective environmental clearances, upholding prior ruling.

最高法院于2026年2月12日驳回国会议员Jairam Ramesh的请愿, 质疑追溯性环境清理, 认为这项行动在法律上站不住脚, The Supreme Court on February 12, 2026, rejected a petition by Congress MP Jairam Ramesh challenging retrospective environmental clearances, calling the move legally untenable and potentially for media attention. 由首席大法官Surya Kant领导的法官小组裁定,这个问题已经通过2025年11月由三名法官作出的先前裁决得到解决,该裁决维护了政府给予此类许可并处以刑罚的权力。 A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant ruled that the issue had already been settled by a prior three-judge decision in November 2025, which upheld the government’s authority to grant such clearances with penalties. 法院强调,法律质疑必须遵循适当的程序,而不是间接路线,并警告要付出示范性代价。 The court emphasized that legal challenges must follow proper procedures, not indirect routes, and warned of exemplary costs. Ramesh的律师撤回了这一请求,允许他寻求其他法律补救办法。 Ramesh’s counsel withdrew the plea, with permission to pursue other legal remedies. 裁决重申了执行先前判决的2021年办事处备忘录的有效性。 The ruling reaffirmed the validity of the 2021 office memorandum implementing the earlier judgment.