最高法院质疑政府对Ladakh活动家Sonam Wangchuk的拘留, 裁定他的演说不是煽动, The Supreme Court questioned the government's detention of Ladakh activist Sonam Wangchuk, ruling his speech wasn't incitement and stressing lack of proof linking him to violence.

最高法院质疑政府根据《国家安全法》拘留Ladakh气候活动家Sonam Wangchuk的理由, 批评政府将他的讲话和社交媒体文章解释为煽动暴力。 The Supreme Court questioned the government’s justification for detaining Ladakh climate activist Sonam Wangchuk under the National Security Act, criticizing its interpretation of his speeches and social media posts as incitement to violence. 中心辩称,他谈到青年放弃非暴力抗议,并提到外国运动构成挑衅,但法院注意到,他的声明反映了关切,而不是煽动,强调仅凭怀疑不足以防范性拘留。 While the Centre argued his remarks about youth abandoning non-violent protest and references to foreign movements constituted provocation, the Court noted his statements reflected concern, not incitement, and emphasized that suspicion alone is insufficient for preventive detention. 法官们强调,他的话与2025年9月24日的雷赫暴力事件之间必须有明确、直接的联系,拒绝基于原有职位提出的诉求。 The Bench stressed the need for a clear, direct link between his words and the September 24, 2025, violence in Leh, rejecting claims based on pre-existing posts. 尽管政府声称Wangchuk在经过24次体检后是合适的,而且保留拘留理由仍然有效,但法院对他的健康表示关切,并继续审查他目前被拘留的合法性。 Despite the government asserting Wangchuk is fit after 24 medical exams and maintaining detention grounds remain valid, the Court expressed concern over his health and continues reviewing the legality of his ongoing detention.