南卡罗来纳州最高法院在Alex Murdaugh的上诉中听取了关于他2021年双重谋杀定罪的论据,重点是陪审团篡改申诉和证据可采性。 South Carolina's Supreme Court heard arguments in Alex Murdaugh’s appeal over his 2021 double-murder conviction, focusing on jury tampering claims and evidence admissibility.

南卡罗来纳州最高法院审理了Alex Murdaugh对2021年双重谋杀定罪的上诉中的论点,重点是据称影响陪审员的前Colleton县办事员Becky Hill操纵陪审团的指控,以及广泛的金融犯罪证据的可采性。 The South Carolina Supreme Court heard arguments in Alex Murdaugh’s appeal of his 2021 double-murder conviction, focusing on claims of jury tampering by former Colleton County Clerk Becky Hill, who allegedly influenced jurors, and the admissibility of extensive financial crime evidence. Murdaugh的辩护称,缺乏物证、调查错误和有偏见的证词,而检察官则维护证据,包括手机数据和财务记录、确定的动机和罪行。 Murdaugh’s defense cited lack of physical evidence, investigative errors, and prejudicial testimony, while prosecutors maintained the evidence, including cell phone data and financial records, established motive and guilt. 法官就程序公正性和外部影响的影响向双方提出疑问,没有作出决定的时限。 Justices questioned both sides on procedural fairness and the impact of external influences, with no timeline for a decision.