一名密歇根法官拒绝司法部关于未编辑选民数据的要求, 理由是隐私和法律过度, 加强了国家对选举的控制。 A Michigan judge blocked the DOJ’s request for unredacted voter data, citing privacy and legal overreach, reinforcing state control over elections.

密歇根州一名联邦法官驳回了司法部要求查阅州未编辑的选民名册的诉讼,裁定司法部引用的联邦法律不要求各州提供详细的选民数据。 A federal judge in Michigan dismissed a Justice Department lawsuit seeking access to the state’s unredacted voter rolls, ruling that federal laws cited by the DOJ do not require states to provide detailed voter data. 特朗普任命的Hala Jarbou法官认为该请求超越了法律权限,并提出了重大隐私问题。 Judge Hala Jarbou, a Trump appointee, concluded the request exceeded legal authority and raised significant privacy concerns. 这项裁决是一系列法院驳回类似联邦努力的最近一次,加强了国家对选举管理和选民隐私的控制。 The decision marks the latest in a series of court rejections of similar federal efforts, reinforcing state control over election administration and voter privacy. 司法部辩称,数据对于选举的完整性是必要的,但密歇根州官员和隐私维护者反对这一请求,称存在滥用的风险。 The DOJ had argued the data was needed for election integrity, but Michigan officials and privacy advocates opposed the request, citing risks of misuse. 这项裁决是在俄勒冈州、加利福尼亚州和佐治亚州类似的驳回裁决之后作出的。 The ruling follows similar dismissals in Oregon, California, and Georgia. 司法部没有宣布是否将提出上诉。 The DOJ has not announced whether it will appeal.