最高法院将裁定亚利桑那州对州外葡萄酒销售商的州内商店要求是否侵犯了州际商业权利。 The Supreme Court will rule on whether Arizona’s in-state store requirement for out-of-state wine sellers violates interstate commerce rights.

美国最高法院将裁定亚利桑那州要求州外葡萄酒销售商拥有州内有形商店前门的法律是否违反多曼特商业条款。 The U.S. Supreme Court is set to decide whether Arizona’s law requiring out-of-state wine sellers to have an in-state physical storefront violates the Dormant Commerce Clause. 批评者认为,尽管先前的裁决禁止国家颁布保护主义的酒精管制条例,但这项规则不公平地阻断了州外企业,有利于当地零售商。 Critics argue the rule unfairly blocks out-of-state businesses, favoring local retailers, despite prior rulings that prohibit states from enacting protectionist alcohol regulations. 下级法院使用“基本特征”检验标准来维护这些法律,但法律专家说,通过颁发许可证的现代监管可以确保遵守,而无需实际存在。 Lower courts have used an “essential feature” test to uphold such laws, but legal experts say modern regulation through licensing can ensure compliance without physical presence. 法院的裁决可以澄清州际商务中国家权力的宪法限制,有可能使其他国家的类似限制无效。 The Court’s decision could clarify constitutional limits on state power in interstate commerce, potentially invalidating similar restrictions in other states.