Raskin警告SAVE法案的身份证规则可能会损害妇女的投票权,但专家说这符合宪法和需要,没有欺诈的证据。 Raskin warns SAVE Act’s ID rules may harm women’s voting rights, but experts say it’s constitutional and needed, with no proof of fraud.

Jamie Raskin(D-MD)认为,《SAVE法》可能要求证明公民身份,并为更改姓名的人设置障碍,从而可能违反第19项修正案,从而给妇女的投票权带来负担。 Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) argued the SAVE Act could burden women’s voting rights by requiring proof of citizenship and creating hurdles for those who changed their names, potentially violating the 19th Amendment. 他声称该法案的文件要求,如同更改姓名的宣誓书一样,可以阻止选民,尽管法律允许国家签发证明,而不允许在投票时颁发出生证。 He claimed the bill’s documentation requirements, like affidavits for name changes, could deter voters, despite the law allowing state-issued attestations and not mandating birth certificates at polls. 包括法律专家在内的批评者指出,第19项修正案并不免除选民的资格证明,身份证要求符合宪法并得到广泛支持。 Critics, including legal experts, say the 19th Amendment does not exempt voters from proving eligibility, and ID requirements are constitutional and widely supported. 没有证据表明普遍存在选民欺诈行为,因此法律是正当的,而且现有系统已经处理姓名变更问题。 No evidence of widespread voter fraud justifies the law, and existing systems already handle name changes. 辩论反映的是党派分歧,而不是法律或事实关切。 The debate reflects partisan divisions rather than legal or factual concerns.