俄勒冈州提出对定罪进行有针对性的审查,利用污名化的法医证据,如咬痕分析。 Oregon proposes targeted review of convictions using discredited forensic evidence like bite mark analysis.

俄勒冈州立法者提出了一项旨在处理错误定罪的修改法案,特别侧重于涉及诸如咬痕分析和毛发显微镜等有失信誉的法医方法的案件。 Oregon lawmakers have introduced a revised bill aimed at addressing wrongful convictions, focusing specifically on cases involving discredited forensic methods like bite mark analysis and hair microscopy. 拟议的立法将建立一个更有针对性的程序,在这类有缺陷的证据发挥关键作用的情况下对定罪进行审查,将资格限制在被科学界广泛拒绝的法医技术案件中。 The proposed legislation would create a more targeted process for reviewing convictions where such flawed evidence played a key role, limiting eligibility to cases where the forensic technique has been widely rejected by the scientific community. 该法案力求在问责制与实际制约因素之间取得平衡,避免程序的广泛扩展,同时仍然为那些被错误监禁的人提供救济。 The bill seeks to balance accountability with practical constraints, avoiding broad expansions of the process while still providing relief to those wrongfully imprisoned.