一名联邦法官裁定,UCLA-Rose Bowl的争议将因UCLA改变地点而提交陪审团审判,而不是仲裁。 A federal judge ruled that a UCLA-Rose Bowl dispute will go to jury trial, not arbitration, over UCLA's venue change.

一名联邦法官裁定,涉及加州大学洛杉矶分校和玫瑰碗的争端将由陪审团而不是仲裁员裁定,驳回关于此事应通过私人仲裁解决的主张。 A federal judge ruled that a dispute involving UCLA and the Rose Bowl will be decided by a jury rather than an arbitrator, rejecting claims that the matter should be settled through private arbitration. 决定意味着案件将在法院进行,允许陪审团对UCLA是否违反其与Rose Bowl协议的问题进行审判。 The decision means the case will proceed in court, allowing for a jury trial on the issue of whether UCLA violated its agreement with the Rose Bowl. 这个案例源于加州大学洛杉矶分校决定在不同地点玩足球比赛, 引起关于合同义务及玫瑰碗在大学足球中作用的未来的疑问。 The case stems from UCLA’s decision to play its football games at a different venue, raising questions about contractual obligations and the future of the Rose Bowl’s role in college football.