联邦上诉法院质疑特朗普政府出于适当程序考虑将他迅速递解到第三国的做法。 A federal appeals court questioned the Trump administration’s fast-track deportations to third countries over due process concerns.

波士顿的一个联邦上诉法院对特朗普政府迅速驱逐到第三国的政策表示关切,质疑其遵守正当程序的情况,尽管它表示可能会限制下级法院的全国禁令。 A federal appeals court in Boston expressed concern over the Trump administration’s rapid deportation policy to third countries, questioning its compliance with due process despite signaling it may limit a lower court’s nationwide injunction. 该政策只允许提前六小时通知递解出境,并依靠外交保证,在移徙者没有足够时间对遭受迫害或酷刑的风险提出异议时,面临法律挑战。 The policy, allowing deportations with as little as six hours’ notice and relying on diplomatic assurances, faces legal challenges over insufficient time for migrants to contest risks of persecution or torture. 虽然最高法院最近允许该政策暂时实施,但上诉法院建议将禁令的范围缩小至4名点名原告。 While the Supreme Court recently allowed the policy to proceed temporarily, the appeals court suggested narrowing the injunction to four named plaintiffs. 案件,D. V. D. The case, D.V.D. v. U.S.国土安全部,仍未解决。 v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, remains unresolved.