德里高等法院以损害名誉和品牌为由,将诽谤性的社交媒体文章封锁在反对PhisphyWallah的网站上。 Delhi High Court blocks defamatory social media posts against PhysicsWallah, citing harm to reputation and brand.

德里高等法院裁定,言论自由并不能保护损害名誉的诽谤性或恶意社交媒体内容,特别是在造成不可弥补的损害时。 The Delhi High Court ruled that freedom of speech does not protect defamatory or malicious social media content that harms reputations, especially when it causes irreparable damage. 在涉及教育科技公司PhysicsWallah的案件中，法院发布临时禁令，要求删除一名前员工指控该公司为“骗局”的视频和帖子，法院认定有初步证据涉及诽谤、品牌贬损和商标侵权。 In a case involving ed-tech company PhysicsWallah, the court issued an interim injunction to remove videos and posts by a former employee accusing the company of being a "scam," finding prima facie evidence of defamation, brand disparagement, and trademark infringement. 法院强调,第21条规定的名誉权限制了言论自由,特别是鉴于社交媒体的迅速、广泛普及。 The court emphasized that the right to reputation under Article 21 limits free expression, particularly given social media’s rapid, widespread reach. 它命令立即撤除并阻止进一步传播,加强第十九条第(2)款规定的合理限制适用于预防损害。 It ordered immediate takedowns and blocked further dissemination, reinforcing that reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2) apply to prevent harm.