ICE代理商不能免于法律诉讼;法院阻止了无证突袭,受害者可以根据联邦法律起诉虐待行为。 ICE agents aren't immune to legal action; courts have blocked warrantless raids, and victims can sue under federal law for abuses.

与副总统JD Vance等官员的声称相反,ICE代理人员不能免于法律问责。 Contrary to claims by officials like Vice President JD Vance, ICE agents are not immune from legal accountability. 2025年5月一份泄露的备忘录建议特工人员在没有逮捕证的情况下可以进入住宅,这被视为违宪,违反了《第四修正案》的逮捕证要求。 A leaked May 2025 memo suggesting agents could enter homes without warrants was deemed unconstitutional, violating the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. 最近发生的事件,包括无证突袭美国公民的住宅以及涉及第二修正案权利的致命枪击事件,凸显了对过度武力和违反宪法行为的关切。 Recent incidents, including a warrantless raid on a U.S. citizen’s home and a fatal shooting involving Second Amendment rights, underscore concerns over excessive force and constitutional violations. 虽然联邦豁免限制了一些诉讼,但受害者仍然可以根据《联邦侵权索赔法》就诸如殴打、假逮捕和非法死亡等侵权行为寻求补救。 While federal immunity limits some lawsuits, victims can still seek redress under the Federal Tort Claims Act for torts like assault, false arrest, and wrongful death. 这些法律途径,连同潜在的州或未来的联邦刑事起诉,是对联邦执法部门逾越权限的重要检查。 These legal avenues, along with potential state or future federal criminal prosecution, serve as critical checks on federal law enforcement overreach.