新西兰工会对FENs的结构调整提出了挑战,理由是在安全问题上磋商不周和削减成本。 New Zealand unions challenge FENZ’s restructuring, citing poor consultation and cost-cutting over safety.

两个新西兰工会正在挑战就业关系管理局提议的消防和紧急Ns重组,声称咨询不足、在最后一刻提交265页的计划以及该机构首席执行官承认的错误。 Two New Zealand unions are challenging Fire and Emergency NZ’s proposed restructuring at the Employment Relations Authority, alleging inadequate consultation, last-minute delivery of a 265-page plan, and errors that were admitted by the agency’s CEO. 他们声称,这一进程可以削减97个非战斗作用,改变其他66个被排除在外的工会。 这一进程是仓促的,其驱动力是削减成本,而不是公共安全,而领导人作出的决定缺乏前线经验。 They claim the process, which could cut 97 non-firefighting roles and alter 66 others, excluded unions, was rushed, and driven by cost-cutting rather than public safety, with decisions made by leaders lacking frontline experience. 工会要求遵守命令,停止改变,直到进行适当协商,并指责政府拒绝为财政压力征收保险费。 The unions seek compliance orders to halt changes until proper consultation occurs and blame the government’s refusal to raise insurance levies for the financial pressures. FENZ维持了旨在拯救数百万人和保持应急反应能力的改组目标,同时保持对话的开放态度。 FENZ maintains the restructure aims to save millions and preserve emergency response capability while remaining open to dialogue.