一位法官裁决西得克萨斯州A&M的拖动表演禁令并没有违反言论自由, A judge ruled West Texas A&M’s drag show ban didn’t violate free speech, citing inappropriate content and venue rules.

一名联邦法官支持西得克萨斯州A&M大学禁止学生带头的拖拉表演, 裁定该大学没有违反第一修正案, A federal judge has upheld West Texas A&M University’s ban on a student-led drag show, ruling the university did not violate the First Amendment by denying space for the 2023 event. Matthew Kacsmaryk法官说,表演缺乏明确的信息,过去的表现包括性暗示内容,说明在向未成年人开放的场所实行限制的理由。 Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk said the performance lacked a clear message and past shows included sexually suggestive content, justifying restrictions at a venue open to minors. 他将遗产厅归类为适用合理、中性观点规则的有限公共论坛。 He classified Legacy Hall as a limited public forum where reasonable, viewpoint-neutral rules apply. LGBT学生团体Spectrum WT计划提出上诉, The decision dismisses an appeal by LGBTQ+ student group Spectrum WT, which plans to appeal, arguing the ruling contradicts Supreme Court precedent. 案例反映了全国对LGBT+++在大学校园的言论和言论自由的更广泛辩论。 The case reflects broader national debates over LGBTQ+ expression and free speech on college campuses.