第四巡回法院维持马里兰州在最敏感的地方对枪支的禁令,根据《第二修正案》称其符合宪法。 The Fourth Circuit upheld Maryland’s ban on guns in most sensitive places, calling it constitutional under the Second Amendment.

第四巡回上诉法院维持马里兰州关于禁止敏感地点(包括学校、政府大楼、医院、体育场和不向公众开放的私人财产)火器的多数法律,认为第二修正案的 " 敏感地点 " 除外,这些限制符合宪法。 The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld most of Maryland’s law banning firearms in sensitive locations, including schools, government buildings, hospitals, stadiums, and private property not open to the public, calling the restrictions constitutional under the Second Amendment’s “sensitive places” exception. 法院废除了禁止对向公众开放的私有财产使用枪支的规定,除非物主同意,并裁定其违宪。 The court struck down the provision banning guns on private property open to the public unless the owner consents, ruling it unconstitutional. 它还推翻了下级法院的裁决,认定在1 000英尺公共示威和喝酒场所内存在宪法限制。 It also reversed lower court decisions, finding constitutional restrictions within 1,000 feet of public demonstrations and alcohol-serving venues. 这项裁决符合对此类法律更广泛的司法支持,是美国最高法院审理夏威夷和加利福尼亚类似案件时作出的。 The ruling aligns with broader judicial support for such laws and comes as the U.S. Supreme Court considers similar cases in Hawaii and California.