德里高等法院支持Sisodia2020年的胜利和Upadhyay2025年的胜利,驳回关于程序缺陷和缺乏证据的申诉。 Delhi High Court upholds Sisodia’s 2020 win and Upadhyay’s 2025 victory, rejecting petitions over procedural flaws and lack of evidence.

2026年1月17日, 德里高等法院驳回多项选举请愿, 包括质疑Manish Sisodia2020年Patparganj胜利的请愿, 以及反对Satish Upadhyay2025年Malviya Nagar获胜的抗议。 On January 17, 2026, the Delhi High Court dismissed multiple election petitions, including one challenging Manish Sisodia’s 2020 Patparganj victory and another contesting Satish Upadhyay’s 2025 Malviya Nagar win. 法院裁定Sisodia的竞选成立, 没有发现任何关于2013年FIR非法竞选或隐瞒的有效证据, 因为只有提出指控时才需要披露。 The court ruled that Sisodia’s election stood, finding no valid evidence of illegal campaigning or concealment of a 2013 FIR, as disclosure is only required when charges are framed. 在Malviya Nagar案中,法院驳回了Somnath Bharti的请愿,因为程序失败:他没有按照《人民代表法》的要求,向国会候选人Jitender Kumar Kochar提出申诉,使请愿无法维持,尽管有人指控有人操纵选票和腐败行径。 In the Malviya Nagar case, the court dismissed Somnath Bharti’s petition due to a procedural failure: he did not implead the Congress candidate, Jitender Kumar Kochar, as required under the Representation of the People Act, rendering the petition non-maintainable despite allegations of vote manipulation and corrupt practices. 法院强调严格遵守法律程序,指出在最后期限过后无法纠正这种缺陷。 The court emphasized strict adherence to legal procedures, stating that such defects cannot be cured after the deadline.