最高法院将裁定地理搜查令是否违反了《第四修正案》。 The Supreme Court will rule on whether geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment.

美国最高法院将裁定,执法部门为了在犯罪期间从特定地区所有手机获取定位数据而使用地理搜查令,是否违反了《第四修正案》。 The U.S. Supreme Court will decide whether geofence warrants—used by law enforcement to obtain location data from all cellphones in a specific area during a crime—violate the Fourth Amendment. 该案源于弗吉尼亚州2019年的银行抢劫案,在那里,逮捕令导致Okello Chatrie被逮捕,Okello Chatrie认罪。 The case stems from a 2019 bank robbery in Virginia, where a warrant led to the arrest of Okello Chatrie, who pleaded guilty. 而检察官则说用户与谷歌共享定位数据, 从而丧失隐私。 His defense argued the warrant unlawfully collected data from innocent people without individualized suspicion, while prosecutors said users forfeit privacy by sharing location data with Google. 一名联邦法官称这次搜查违宪,但以善意为由允许提供证据。 A federal judge called the search unconstitutional but allowed the evidence, citing good faith. 分立的上诉法院做出了相互矛盾的裁决,为最高法院预计今年晚些时候作出的最后裁决创造了条件,这可能会改变数字隐私权。 Divided appeals courts have reached conflicting rulings, setting the stage for the Supreme Court’s final decision, expected later this year, which could reshape digital privacy rights.