新加坡法院驳回了Fiona Lee及其丈夫对前Julius Baer经理Loh Kia Hui的过失索赔,其理由是Lithium Americas股份的利润损失。 Singapore's court rejected a negligence claim by Fiona Lee and her husband against former Julius Baer manager Loh Kia Hui over lost profits from Lithium Americas shares.

新加坡高等法院驳回了台湾出生的女商人Fiona Lee及其丈夫对前Julius Baer经理Loh Kia Hui的疏忽诉讼。 Singapore’s High Court dismissed a negligence lawsuit by Taiwanese-born businesswoman Fiona Lee and her husband against former Julius Baer manager Loh Kia Hui. 他们声称,Loh公司承诺监测美洲Lithium公司的股份,并在价格低于C1时提醒他们注意,导致2017年的销售,在5:1股股份合并后,他们损失了潜在利润。 They claimed Loh promised to monitor Lithium Americas Corp shares and alert them if prices fell below C$1, leading to a sale in 2017 that cost them potential profits after a 5:1 share consolidation. 法院未发现Loh承诺监测价格或建议短期贸易的证据,裁定这对夫妇未能证明其依赖性,并认定除了合同之外没有任何法律义务存在。 The court found no evidence Loh promised to monitor prices or advise short-term trading, ruled the couple failed to prove reliance, and concluded no legal duty beyond their contract existed. 法官还驳回了利润损失索赔和一项要求赔偿的反诉。 The judge also rejected claims of lost profits and a counterclaim for indemnity. 该裁决于2025年12月22日发布。 The ruling was issued December 22, 2025.