对只使用飞钓的规则提起的缅因州诉讼突显了关于平衡养护、以科学为基础的条例和公众对管理脆弱鳟鱼流的投入的辩论。 A Maine lawsuit over fly-fishing-only rules highlights debate on balancing conservation, science-based regulations, and public input in managing vulnerable trout streams.

一场针对缅因州只使用飞钓的条例的诉讼引发了有关渔业管理的重新辩论,而养护团体则敦促公众对法院裁决提出意见。 A lawsuit challenging Maine’s fly-fishing-only regulations has sparked renewed debate over fisheries management, with conservation groups urging public input over court decisions. 它们强调,以科学为基础的规则通过降低死亡率和支持捕获和释放,保护营养贫乏、气候脆弱溪流中生长缓慢的溪鳟。 They emphasize that the rules, based on science, protect slow-growing brook trout in nutrient-poor, climate-vulnerable streams by reducing mortality and supporting catch-and-release. 这些措施有助于维持生态系统、饮用水、野生生物和农村经济。 These measures help sustain ecosystems, drinking water, wildlife, and rural economies. 倡导者说,专家和公众的开放、适应性管理胜于诉讼,以平衡获取与保护之间的平衡。 Advocates say open, adaptive management by experts and the public is better than litigation for balancing access with conservation.