德里高等法院对婚姻冲突期间受保护的堕胎权利作了规定,维护了第21条规定的妇女自主权。 Delhi High Court rules abortion rights protected during marital conflict, upholding woman's autonomy under Article 21.

德里高等法院裁定,即使在婚姻不和的情况下,妇女堕胎的权利也受到保护,法院指出,强迫她继续怀孕侵犯了她的身体完整性并恶化了心理健康。 The Delhi High Court ruled that a woman's right to abortion is protected even amid marital discord, stating that forcing her to continue a pregnancy violates her bodily integrity and worsens mental health. 在1月6日的一项决定中,Neena Bansal Krishna法官释放了一名终止14周怀孕的妇女,确认《医疗终止妊娠法》并不要求配偶同意。 In a January 6 decision, Justice Neena Bansal Krishna discharged a woman who terminated a 14-week pregnancy, affirming that the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act does not require spousal consent. 法院认为,精神痛苦和打算终止婚姻(有医疗记录证明)构成法律的正当理由,妇女生育自主是第二十一条规定的一项基本权利。 The court held that emotional distress and intent to end the marriage—evidenced by medical records—constitute valid grounds under the law, and that a woman’s reproductive autonomy is a fundamental right under Article 21. 判决对“物质情况变化”的解释广义上包括婚姻破裂,强调妇女不得因心理健康问题而因寻求堕胎而面临刑事起诉。 The judgment interprets "change of material circumstances" broadly to include marital breakdown, reinforcing that women must not face criminal prosecution for seeking abortions due to mental health concerns.