PH立法者质疑P150.9B未编入方案的预算资金违宪,试图停止支付款项。 PH lawmakers challenge P150.9B unprogrammed budget funds as unconstitutional, seeking to halt disbursements.

菲律宾立法者莱拉·德利马(Leila De Lima)和埃德加·埃里克(Edgar Erice)于2026年1月8日向最高法院递交请愿书,质疑2026年预算中未编入方案的1 1509亿菲律宾比索拨款(UA)的合宪性,认为它们违反《宪法》,允许行政开支,而没有有保障的资金来源或立法监督。 Philippine lawmakers Leila De Lima and Edgar Erice filed a Supreme Court petition on January 8, 2026, challenging the constitutionality of P150.9 billion in unprogrammed appropriations (UA) in the 2026 budget, arguing they violate the Constitution by allowing executive spending without guaranteed funding sources or legislative scrutiny. 他们要求发出临时限制令,以停止付款,声称普遍获得服务会破坏财政问责制和权力分立。 They seek a temporary restraining order to halt disbursements, claiming UAs undermine fiscal accountability and separation of powers. 预算和管理事务部援引最高法院以往的裁决和与盈余收入挂钩的严格的释放条件,以合法理由为这些基金辩护。 The Department of Budget and Management defends the funds as legal, citing past Supreme Court rulings and strict release conditions tied to surplus revenues. 请愿书强调了对透明度、财政纪律和滥用可能性的担忧,法院现在准备对这一做法的合法性作出裁决。 The petition highlights concerns over transparency, fiscal discipline, and the potential for misuse, with the Court now poised to rule on the practice’s legality.