遗传识字项目否认是2026年1月5日的公司战线,而一项PNAS研究则强调国家主权如何损害了全球生物多样性的努力。 The Genetic Literacy Project denied being a corporate front on Jan. 5, 2026, while a PNAS study highlighted how national sovereignty has harmed global biodiversity efforts.

2026年1月5日, 一位非营利组织(GLP)的遗传素养项目(GLP)再次承诺坚持事实的准确性和透明度, The Genetic Literacy Project (GLP), a nonprofit, reaffirmed its commitment to factual accuracy and transparency on January 5, 2026, denying allegations it is a corporate front. 它列举了其廉正政策、公共年度报告和一项跟踪基因编辑条例的互动式全球地图。 It cited its integrity policies, public annual reports, and an interactive global map tracking gene editing regulations. David Bertioli共同撰写的2026年1月PNAS研究批评了自1990年代以来生物多样性治理从全球主权向国家主权的转变,认为这增加了成本,限制了遗传资源的获取,阻碍了国际合作,最终破坏了养护和农业创新。 A January 2026 PNAS study co-authored by David Bertioli criticized the shift from global to national sovereignty in biodiversity governance since the 1990s, arguing it has increased costs, restricted access to genetic resources, and hindered international collaboration, ultimately undermining conservation and agricultural innovation.