一名加拿大女性因对无人机监控的隐私担忧, 在警方撤销指控后, 避免了一张500美元的分心驾驶票。 A Canadian woman avoided a $500 distracted driving ticket after police dropped charges due to privacy concerns over drone surveillance.

在警方于2025年夏天使用无人驾驶飞机监测驾驶员后, 一名金斯顿女子被撤回了500美元的分心驾驶票。 A Kingston woman had a $500 distracted driving ticket withdrawn after police used a drone with zoom capabilities to monitor drivers during a summer 2025 enforcement blitz. Nav Canada为事故重建等非强制执行目的授权的无人驾驶飞机被用来识别交叉路口的电话使用,导致她在拍摄无人驾驶飞机后停下。 The drone, authorized by Nav Canada for non-enforcement purposes like accident reconstruction, was used to identify phone use at intersections, leading to her stop after she photographed the drone. 加拿大宪法基金会根据《宪章》第8条对监视作为侵犯隐私的行为提出质疑,认为这相当于不合理的搜查。 The Canadian Constitution Foundation challenged the surveillance as a violation of privacy under Section 8 of the Charter, arguing it amounted to an unreasonable search. 虽然警方说这次行动是合法的,并导致20张罚单,但王室出于隐私考虑撤销了起诉。 Though police said the operation was lawful and resulted in 20 tickets, the Crown dropped the charges amid privacy concerns.